When news broke about the Federal Trade Commission’s decision to ban non-compete agreements, I was reminded of my own experience leaving a blockchain startup to join another early-stage company. When I left, my former employer sent me a cease-and-desist letter alleging that I had violated the non-compete clause in my employment contract.
Despite the weak legal basis for their claims, I became embroiled in a protracted dispute that resulted in financial loss, emotional strain, and months of unemployment. My story is not unique. Nearly one in five Americans has a non-compete agreement, creating an unnecessary hurdle for both employees and employers.
The FTC’s move to ban non-compete agreements is an important step forward, and Chair Lina M. Khan said increased competition could spur the creation of 8,500 new startups. As someone who works in the blockchain and digital asset space, I believe this decision is consistent with the open source spirit that is fundamental to innovation in the industry.
It is ironic that a blockchain startup built on the principles of decentralization and collaboration would resort to enforcing restrictive non-compete clauses. Moreover, the contrast between my experience and California’s long-standing non-compete ban highlights the potential impact of such regulations on fostering innovation and entrepreneurship.
The FTC’s action signals positive change not only for individual employees like me, but also for the broader cryptocurrency industry, where talent mobility and innovation thrive in an environment free of unnecessary restrictions.
Featured Image: Freepik
Please see disclaimer