Crypto Flexs
  • DIRECTORY
  • CRYPTO
    • ETHEREUM
    • BITCOIN
    • ALTCOIN
  • BLOCKCHAIN
  • EXCHANGE
  • TRADING
  • SUBMIT
Crypto Flexs
  • DIRECTORY
  • CRYPTO
    • ETHEREUM
    • BITCOIN
    • ALTCOIN
  • BLOCKCHAIN
  • EXCHANGE
  • TRADING
  • SUBMIT
Crypto Flexs
Home»BITCOIN NEWS»Address – Did the uncompressed public key use the ’04’ prefix before the compressed public key was used?
BITCOIN NEWS

Address – Did the uncompressed public key use the ’04’ prefix before the compressed public key was used?

By Crypto FlexsJune 4, 20242 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Address – Did the uncompressed public key use the ’04’ prefix before the compressed public key was used?
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Did uncompressed keys always use the 04 prefix, even before compressed keys (which used 02, 03) came into use?

yes.

Has Bitcoin gone through an update to add these prefixes to various key types?

There are no updates to add prefixes.

However, Bitcoin wallet software has been updated to use these compressed keys. At the time, OpenSSL was used for signature verification and accepted both compressed and uncompressed public keys, so there were no changes to the required consensus rules/implementation. Actually, there is a third type that was (and still is) supported. hybrid Keys using prefixes 06 or 07 (according to even/odd T coordinates), 32 bytes and 32 bytes Y coordinate. I don’t understand the motivation for having such a type, but it is part of the implemented specification.

So these prefixes are included in the hash used to generate the address, so have addresses using uncompressed keys “changed” when compressed keys are introduced?

If these prefixes didn’t actually exist in the first place, it would have been a hard fork to introduce them. Fortunately, no changes were needed.

Of course, wallets switching from uncompressed public keys to compressed public keys had to change their addresses. However, since the sender only sees the 160-bit public key hash, only the recipient cares about the distinction. At consumption time, the recipient must reveal its entire public key, and its hash must match the sent public key hash.

If you have a very old Bitcoin Core wallet.dat file that has never been updated and you load it into the latest Bitcoin Core 27.0 software, you can still go back to the previous version since it uses the uncompressed public key to generate the P2PKH address. Previous version. However, this feature will not continue to work as legacy wallet support is scheduled to be removed from Bitcoin Core. You can still use these older files, but you must first convert them to a newer format.

Additionally, since the introduction of compressed public keys, there has actually been a new address type (with Applicable consensus changes): P2SH, segwit, and taproot.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

transaction – How to programmatically determine which Tx consumed an OutPoint

February 12, 2026

Slot drops $180,000 in one blink.

February 6, 2026

How high can $SHIB go in the next cryptocurrency rally?

January 31, 2026
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Recent Posts

BYDFi joins Solana to accelerate APAC from Hong Kong Consensus and expand participation in Solana ecosystem

February 15, 2026

Tomasz’s update | Ethereum Foundation Blog

February 15, 2026

ETH ETF loses $242M despite holding $2K in Ether

February 15, 2026

Cryptocurrency Inheritance Update: January 2026

February 14, 2026

Pepe Price Prediction – What Are the Best Meme Coins to Buy During the Crypto Market Crash?

February 14, 2026

Monoup Unveils Ways For Crypto Payments Optimization In Digital Business

February 14, 2026

Crypto Casinos – How Blockchain Is Redefining Trust In Online Gambling

February 14, 2026

Boerse Stuttgart Digital merges with Tradias to create European cryptocurrency hub

February 13, 2026

Zerion Opens Enterprise Wallet Data API To All Developers

February 13, 2026

transaction – How to programmatically determine which Tx consumed an OutPoint

February 12, 2026

The fake MetaMask 2FA phishing scam uses a sophisticated design to steal your wallet seed phrase.

February 12, 2026

Crypto Flexs is a Professional Cryptocurrency News Platform. Here we will provide you only interesting content, which you will like very much. We’re dedicated to providing you the best of Cryptocurrency. We hope you enjoy our Cryptocurrency News as much as we enjoy offering them to you.

Contact Us : Partner(@)Cryptoflexs.com

Top Insights

BYDFi joins Solana to accelerate APAC from Hong Kong Consensus and expand participation in Solana ecosystem

February 15, 2026

Tomasz’s update | Ethereum Foundation Blog

February 15, 2026

ETH ETF loses $242M despite holding $2K in Ether

February 15, 2026
Most Popular

BNB’s recovery road: Can you close the gap between XRP and Solana?

January 26, 2025

ONyc Launches On Kamino, Unlocking Real-World Yield And Collateral Utility In Solana DeFi

August 5, 2025

Devconnect Istanbul 2023 – A celebration of progress and the Ethereum community

December 5, 2023
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
© 2026 Crypto Flexs

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.