simply
- The prosecution admitted that the initial metadata was omitted to help identify the message that the initial Telegram logs delivered.
- According to the defense of the storm, the misunderstanding can misunderstand and contaminate events.
- Legal experts say that errors are raising concerns about certification according to the federal rules.
Lawyers of Roman Storm, co -founder of Crypto Mixer Tornado Cash, accused the US prosecution that he had misunderstood evidence just before his criminal trial.
A Court submission On Friday, the defense team of the storm said that the prosecution misunderstood the main telegram message from the call of the co -defendant Alexey PertSev. The message lacked proper attributes and may have affected the great jury with false information.
The dispute focuses on the chat log extracted by US agent Peter Dickerman in a device seized by the Dutch authorities. The government first told the court that he had chatted in September 2023.
Still, it is correction On Friday, this captain admitted that he shared only the final version of the chat that clearly marked the message delivered in December 2024.
The storm lawyer said that incomplete extraction omitted major metadata and that the US prosecution could trust the evidence.
Storm’s lawyers seem to be “ridiculous” the theory of the government.
The lawyers said, “When the victim of the threat goes forward to the police, I will burn your house.
This is a storm claim With the protocol to operate the money laundry and unlicensed money transmission business.
Problem of authenticity
A letter US lawyers Ben Arad, Tanne, and Benjamin Gianporti, who were submitted on Saturdays in New York, said that Benjamin Gianporti, who was signed as a prosecutor of this incident, was shared as a general text file in September 2023. Acknowledged.
Like the HTML files first received from the Dutch authorities, the prosecution added, “We cannot identify when the message is delivered.” The prosecution added.
According to the prosecution, the version that I want to use in the trial was directly extracted by IRS special agent Dickerman and shared with the defense in December 2024.
The prosecution claims that the previous format is “nothing to do with the authenticity,” and the defense claims that it has a proper formatted message for seven months before the trial was raised three days before the trial.
Rules and errors
However, the strength of the opposition to defense depends on AR Media’s Andrew Rossow, Digital Media Lawyers and CEOs if the original presenter can confirm the statement, or if another evidence supports the charges. decoding.
Storm’s team reviewed hundreds of government exhibitions released at the end of last month, resulting in defects. Unlike the standard telegram message that shows the location of the message, the government’s version omits the metadata.
Rossow said, “Without the author’s metadata, we are undergoing a higher level of investigation because reliability and permission must be undoubtedly solved and concerned. Federal rulesThe government must prove what evidence it is.
Rossow asked if late modifications strengthened their position.
“The prosecution cannot benefit by disclosing his mistake in a timely manner.”
Points to Rossow Brady vs. Maryland (1963)A groundbreaking example of establishing what is now known as the “Brady Rules”. Accordingly, the prosecution has a continuous obligation to modify material false statements throughout the procedure.
This kind of late discovery said, “You can actually strengthen the defense debate,” he said, “The prosecution could not disclose it before, but it could strengthen the defense depending on whether it was not disclosed, no pattern did not see the wrong pattern, or whether part of the case was decided in a defective evidence.
decoding I contacted you for opinions on Waymaker LLP and Hecker Fink LLP’s Doj and STORM’s legal advisors.
Daily brief newsletter
Start every day with the best news articles, original features, podcasts, and videos.